The Investment Thesis: Why It Matters in Venture Capital

In venture capital, the investment thesis is foundational. Whether you intend to raise a fund or build a career in venture, your thesis is a clear and concise statement which defines what you invest in and why you are the best person to do it. It is the basis for how you source opportunities, how you are perceived by founders, other investors and Limited Partners. In other words, your investment thesis will tell you where you should invest your limited time and attention.

What Is an Investment Thesis?

At its core, an investment thesis explains:

1. What your investment focus is (sector / geography / stage)
2. Why you are uniquely positioned to invest in that successfully

That positioning might come from expertise, network, experience, or data — but it must be grounded in credibility rather than preference or curiosity.

Key Components of a Strong Thesis

A high-quality theses will include:

• Sector / Market Focus (e.g., climate, enterprise SaaS, fintech infrastructure)
• Geography (e.g., LATAM, U.S., Nordics, Sub-Saharan Africa)
• Stage Focus (e.g., angel, pre-seed, seed)
• Differentiation / Edge / Secret Sauce (why you are the best person to invest here)

A thesis should be clear, narrow, and defensible.

Two Applications of the Investment Thesis

There are two main applications of a thesis in venture:

1. The Fund Thesis: Used When Launching a Fund

A fund thesis is what a manager presents to Limited Partners when raising capital for a new fund. A Fund Thesis explains what the fund will invest in and why this team is uniquely suited to execute that strategy successfully. It is evaluated through the lens of the Limited Partners’ interest i.e. expected returns and credible edge.

The fund thesis commonly follows a standard format when raising a first-time fund:

“[Fund] is raising a [$X MM] [stage] fund in [geography] to back [sector] companies, leveraging [secret sauce metric].”

The thesis must signal to LPs that the manager can execute the strategy today, not in theory later. This is where “secret sauce” matters: past exits, past markups, ecosystem wins, or other quantifiable evidence that align with the investment focus and help to convince LPs why the GP is uniquely qualified to create outsized returns in this particular stage, sector and geography. 

2. The Personal Thesis: Used to Focus Time, Effort, and Career

A Personal Thesis is different. It helps individuals determine where they should invest their effort to build an edge that does not yet exist. It is used to decide:

• what type of VC jobs to apply for,
• what founders to spend time with,
• what ecosystems to plug into,
• what markets to study deeply,
• Which LPs to engage, 
• and where to build network density.

A personal thesis is directional and developmental. It guides how you will build future edge that later translates into a compelling fund thesis or a strong job application.

A Personal Thesis becomes very valuable when positioning yourself to fund managers looking to grow their VC firms’ teams. It helps to convey alignment between the candidate and the fund in terms, and helps the candidate articulate what they have achieved in that investment space to date. A strong differentiated Personal Thesis can help a candidate stand out over other applicants during the hiring process. 

Secret Sauce and the Path from Personal to Fund Thesis

The primary distinction between a Personal Thesis and a Fund Thesis is the presence of demonstrable edge, also known as the ‘Secret Sauce’. 

A Fund Thesis assumes that edge already exists today, meaning the prospective manager can point to quantifiable evidence that they are uniquely positioned to generate returns. For example, successful exits, strong markups, companies helped, or other performance-based signals that Limited Partners recognize as credible. 

A Personal Thesis reflects a phase in which edge is still being constructed. Evidence may be more qualitative or practice-based at first, and the individual is actively working toward the capabilities and positioning that will eventually make them a compelling steward of capital. The Personal Thesis is therefore directional and work in progress, while the Fund Thesis is evidentiary.

How to Develop Your Secret Sauce

There are many different ways to build edge as an aspiring VC or future fund manager. The list below is not exhaustive, it illustrates common pathways that have historically led to credible Fund Theses, but individuals are encouraged to be creative. The important constraint is that all activities and signals relate directly to the investment focus of the thesis (i.e., the specific sector, stage, and geography you intend to operate in). Without this alignment, it becomes very difficult to communicate expertise later and nearly impossible to quantify the value of the edge you are building.

A second important point is that the goal is not merely to engage in these activities, but to be able to measure them. Limited Partners and employers expect quantifiable evidence in a Thesis, so the earlier an individual begins tracking relevant metrics, the easier it becomes to formulate an attractive and differentiated Investment Thesis . 

1. Building an Investment Track Record

One direct path to future edge is placing capital into startups that fit the investment focus. This may involve small personal angel checks, even modest amounts such as ~$10K deployed across multiple tickets can establish early proof-of-selection. 

What to track: Number of investments made, total capital deployed, company markups, follow-on rounds, valuation progression, and cumulative unrealized or realized performance. Over time, these metrics mirror the early-stage version of a fund’s performance narrative.

2. Supporting Founders and Companies

Another common route to edge is helping companies inside the investment focus create enterprise value. This could include helping close customers, securing pilots, recruiting critical talent, shaping strategy, or connecting founders to downstream investors. Individuals who pursue this path must document contributions and outcomes, especially when founders acknowledge how support influenced traction or capital formation.

What to track: Number of companies supported, type of support provided, introductions made, pilots or revenue unlocked, fundraising milestones influenced, and any measurable valuation or traction outcomes. These indicators later map to the “value-add investor” capability.

3. Building Proprietary Dealflow

Some individuals build edge by becoming a node in a specific ecosystem. Dealflow-driven edge arises when high-quality founders within a defined market seek you out before they seek institutional capital. This can come from operating experience, sector specialization, community participation, academic networks, or thematic research. Proprietary dealflow is extremely valuable as it gives investors earlier i.e. cheaper access to investment opportunities.

What to track: Dealflow volume, dealflow quality (e.g., % that later raise rounds), how founders found you (inbound vs. outbound), time advantage relative to the market, and concentration of dealflow within the investment focus.

4. Building Network-Based Leverage

Another path to edge is developing a network that directly benefits companies inside your investment focus. This matters only if your relationships either (a) create differentiated, early dealflow or (b) help on-thesis companies grow through customers, revenue, talent, partnerships, validation, or downstream capital. The key is that this network is specific to your sector, stage, and geography, not generic “VC networking.”

What to track: Number of on-thesis founders in your network, deals sourced through your relationships, customer or partner intros made, intros that converted to pilots or revenue, talent referrals placed, and follow-on investors or LPs you’ve helped connect to portfolio companies.

5. Building Credibility With Limited Partners

A very powerful path is building early relationships with the types of LPs who might one day back the fund you are working for. At first, this looks like structured learning, talking to accredited LPs, family offices, or allocators about how they think, what they fund, and why. Over time, it becomes relationship-building where you create value for them through insights, intros, or curated dealflow that matches their interests and produces returns.

What to track: maintain a “little black book” with names of LPs and key connectors, their category (HNW, family office, institutional, etc.), what they’re interested in, how you met, and any value you’ve created for them (e.g., deals shared, intel, warm intros). Track number of conversations, follow-ups, and relationships that deepen over time so you can later point to a real LP network tied to your thesis.

Templates

Below are the two main forms of thesis in venture:

Fund Thesis Template

“[Fund] is raising a [$X MM] [stage] fund in [geography] to back [sector] companies, leveraging [secret sauce / edge metric].”

Personal Thesis Template

“I am building my edge in [sector / geography / stage] because [reason], and have already achieved [track record / founder support / brand / proprietary dealflow].”

The 35-Word Rule

Both the fund thesis and the personal thesis should be concise. As a rule:

Target ≤ 35 words

More than 35 words usually indicates the thesis is not yet sharp enough. Remember the point of the thesis is not to cram everything in but to show your strongest card.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

1. Being vague about the sector of focus
2. Using industry-specific jargon instead of plain language
3. Choosing a focus area that does not align with your secret sauce or edge or the other way around 

About The Author